The jurisdiction of this Court rests on Section 403(a)(3) of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA), Pub. This Court noted probable jurisdiction on November 14, 2008. The jurisdictional statement was filed on August 14, 2008. The decision of the three-judge district court was entered on July 18, 2008. The opinion of the three-judge dis trict court denying appellant's motions for preliminary injunctions (J.A. The opinion of the three-judge district court granting appellee's motion for summary judgment (J.A. Whether the three-judge district court correctly held that the reporting and disclaimer requirements of federal campaign finance law may permissibly be ap plied to advertisements that are not the functional equi valent of express advocacy.
Whether the three-judge district court correctly concluded that appellant's film about then-Senator Hil lary Clinton is the functional equivalent of express advo cacy under the test set forth in FEC v.
In the Supreme Court of the United Statesġ.
0 kommentar(er)
